You may remember a few weeks ago we spoke about Apple having to publish a court-ordered statement on their UK website and ultimately, they did it in such a sarcastic way that they were ordered by the courts to re-write said statement.Â Due to the way in which they wrote the first statement, Apple has been ordered by a UK court to pay Samsungâs legal fees for âembellishingâ its court ordered statement with additional details.
According to a new court order, which was issued on Friday by the UK Court of Appeal Judge Robin Jacob, noted that in the original, âembellishedâ statement, Apple tried to lessen the UK court defeat by comparing it with similar cases in other jurisdictions. These other jurisdictions included Germany, Europe and in the USA where Apple won rulings against Samsung.Â Appleâs original statement includes the line: âin a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design.”
One of the lines within the original statement that drew the most scathing criticism from the judge, was the following:
âSo while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung will-fully copied Apple’s far more popular iPad.â
Judge Robin Jacob noted that this was âcalculated to produce huge confusionâ. He added that âThe false innuendo is that the UK court came to a different conclusion about copying, which is not true for the UK court did not form any view about copying. There is a further false innuendo that the UK courtâs decision is at odds with decisions in other countries whereas that is simply not true.â
Is this the right move for the judge to make or it will only stoke the flames of the technology giant? Let us know below or on our Facebook page!